Compare and contrast these [...] two perspectives. Are they contradictory or
complimentary?
complimentary?
The universe is lifeless now and will be
lifeless then, so insignificant is our presence in it.
The presence of humans is unquestionable,
humans exist. But how did we get there, where we are at? Who created this world
we identify our-self with and reside one day after the other as directed? David
Thoreau desired to escape this self-created Universe. Hence, Thoreau acted and
isolated himself for 2 years and 2 month at an uninhabited place – an area, far
away from the civilization, named Walden Pond. His time at Walden Pond is
characterized through isolation, self-reliance and independence. Moreover he
lived his life as simple as possible and minimized his expenses to the bare
minimum. For instance he lived on a diet based solely on fruits and vegetables,
all given by nature. Marilynne Robinson still
believes on the existence of people living their life as Thoreau experimented,
but those people are abominated by the rest of the society.
Our life is dedicated to labor. According
to Robinson, labor is the coin to purchase
prestige and gives our lives value. Furthermore, she claims that the society is
not aware of the fact why they perform as they implement- they create value and
start to judge their surroundings. Similarly to Thoreau, who shared this side
of mind and tried to observe firsthand the reason for the particular behavior
in dedicating some of his life time not to labor, but to himself. He lived at
the bare minimum, but at the same time consumed life to the fullest.
Humans insist to own things, politics promise
to maximize happiness and develop inventions as the atomic bomb due to increase
power and wealth. However, humans establish wealth through hard labor most of
their lifetime - labor done by depressing wages - according to Robinson this is the life of modern society. In contrast is Thoreau’s
experiment; an example and demonstration of the inner freedom not depending on
tokens, but rather through live without the urge to buy and own
"valuable" things; value is created by humans themselves. Although
Thoreau showed that humans only demand food, shelter, clothing and fuel for
living typically provided by nature itself, many members of the modern world
value different ideologies higher.
Ideology is rational, a pure product of the
human mind. According to Robinson humans create a world able to exploit minds and energies and are
realized so many number of times. The only alternate is to acquire the same
attitude as Thoreau described in Walden 150 years ago, where he proved in
isolation the possibility of a life without the reach of a particular ideology.
Just being one self and in result eliminating the competition between
individuals and countries, as Robinson wishes it.
After all, Robinson is convinced that nothing significant occurs in isolation - humans
depend on each other and unable to discover their inner freedom on their own.
However, Thoreau represents a human-being that must first explore herself
before she can attribute to the life of the others. One view that could not be
considered by Thoreau is the development of the internet and the arising
simplicity that Robinson appreciates and
Thoreau perhaps, had wished for too. Another difference between both was that Robinson deems the goodwill and faith of institutions, but rejects the
exploitation of these Institutions, whereas Thoreau wanted a simple life
including nature and self-reliance - far away from social norms.
No comments:
Post a Comment